African Carbon Credits Gold Rush: Why the continent keeps 6 cents on the dollar?
- Les Africanistes
- Oct 26
- 6 min read
The World’s Cheapest Carbon
Everyone calls it climate finance. It’s not. It’s the world’s newest commodity rush, and Africa doesn’t control it.
Africa’s forests and soils store 150 billion tons of carbon, comparable to the Amazon Basin. They absorb about 0.6 billion tons of CO₂ every year, half the Amazon’s rate, double Indonesia’s, yet African carbon credits sell for one-tenth the value.
Here's what's actually happening: Netflix, Delta, Salesforce, and Boeing are buying African carbon credits worth millions, often from forests that communities already protect and were never going to cut down. Foreign companies are claiming carbon rights over lands communities have protected for generations, then selling those credits at European prices while paying Africans project-based pennies.
In Brazil's Amazon, over half of carbon credit projects overlap with public lands, generating profits from territory developers have no legal right to. The same pattern is emerging across Africa.
This isn't climate finance. It's enclosure, 21st century style.
The African Carbon Credit Price Gap: $5 vs. $80 Per Tonne
Africa’s carbon is sold cheap. While the continent’s ecosystems store vast amounts of carbon, its credits trade at a deep discount.
The same tonne of CO₂ that sells for $5 in Africa trades for $80+ in Europe. That’s not market logic, that’s market design.
Africa is the world’s second-largest tropical carbon sink, but the least paid for it.
Where Africa's Carbon Value Disappears
Carbon pricing is a chain of value extraction. Let's trace the value chain:
Africa currently keeps just 6% of final value through carbon generation alone. Owning both verification and trading infrastructure could raise that to 25-30% : a 5X increase in value retention.
On current volumes, that's the difference between keeping $500 million (at 6%) versus $2.5 billion (at 30%), a 5X increase. By 2030, with higher volumes and prices, it could mean $10-15 billion annually flowing to African treasuries instead of $2 billion.
How Brazil Captures 3X More Value
Brazil's Amazon states expect $10-20 billion this decade from carbon credits. The state of Pará alone signed a $183 million deal for 12 million credits, at $15 per tonne.
What makes Brazil different?
Jurisdictional REDD+ programs: State governments control credits, not individual projects. This creates negotiating power.
National carbon strategy: Brazil treats carbon as a strategic export commodity, integrating it into state budgets and economic planning.
Quality premiums: High-integrity forest protection commands higher prices than renewable energy offsets.
Brazil isn't just selling carbon. They're building a carbon economy with domestic control at every stage.
Indonesia's $65 Billion Carbon Bet
Indonesia launched Southeast Asia's first carbon exchange in 2023, the IDX Carbon Exchange. Their target: $65 billion in carbon revenue by 2028.
Here's their advantage:
25 billion tons of carbon absorption potential (rainforests)
33 billion tons from mangrove conservation
55 billion tons from peatlands
But the real innovation isn't the carbon, it's the infrastructure:
National floor price: $5 per tonne domestic, with export-grade credits at $15-20+
Domestic exchange: Indonesian companies control certification and trading
Strategic positioning: Premium pricing for mangrove and peat restoration projects
Indonesia isn't waiting for foreign buyers to set prices. They're setting their own.
What An African Carbon Exchange Would Actually Do
Imagine an African Carbon Exchange (ACX), backed by the African Development Bank, regional central banks, and sovereign wealth funds:
1. Set continental floor prices: No credit sold below $25/tonne (current: $5-10)
2. Control verification: African certifiers retain fees domestically instead of paying Verra/Gold Standard
3. Create a Sovereign Carbon Fund: Pool national credits for stronger bargaining power (54 countries negotiating together vs. individually)
4. Issue Carbon Bonds: Securitize future credit revenue to finance today's adaptation infrastructure
At current volumes, that's 3-8X more revenue. At projected 2030 volumes with higher prices, it's the difference between $2 billion and $20 billion annually.
That $20 billion? It covers 20-40% of Africa's annual climate adaptation bill, funded by Africa's own assets, not donor promises.
The $100 Billion Climate Bill Africa Can't Pay
Africa is losing 2–5% of its GDP each year to climate shocks: droughts, floods, heatwaves, and crop losses.
The bill for adaptation? $50 billion per year now, rising to $100 billion annually by 2030.
Yet, the continent receives just $11–14 billion annually in climate finance. That leaves an $87 billion gap, every single year.
By 2030, up to 118 million Africans could face extreme heat, drought, or flooding without adequate adaptation measures.
Does controlling the carbon value chain solve this $87 billion annual gap? No. Carbon credits at best cover 15-20% of what's needed, that potential $10-15 billion annually is real money, but it's not a complete solution.
But here's what matters: that $10-15 billion is African capital, not donor promises. It's revenue Africa controls, prices, and deploys, without conditionalities, without waiting for COP conferences, without begging.
The real value isn't closing the adaptation gap. It's proving Africa can monetize its own assets on its own terms. Carbon is just the beginning.
From Climate Aid To Climate Sovereignty
At the Africa Climate Summit 2025 in Addis Ababa, leaders called for $50 billion per year in climate investment.
That target won't come from donors waiting for the next COP conference. It must come from monetizing Africa's own natural capital, on African terms.
Sovereignty means:
African certifiers setting quality standards
African exchanges determining prices
African benchmarks defining value
Because whoever sets the price owns the future.
The Bottom Line:
Africa doesn't just have carbon. Africa has leverage.
The continent faces a $700 billion climate bill by 2030 while sitting on carbon assets that could generate $100+ billion in the same period, if properly valued and controlled.
The difference between $5 per tonne and $50 per tonne isn't only pricing.
It's the difference between climate colonialism and climate sovereignty. Between paying for adaptation and profiting from conservation. Between donor dependency and economic self-determination.
Right now, Africa captures 16% of the global carbon credit market built on African forests. Until the continent builds its own infrastructure: exchanges, verification bodies, pricing mechanisms, it's just trading one form of resource extraction for another.
This time with a green wrapper.
The carbon gold rush is real. The question is whether Africa will own the mines, set the prices, and keep the profits, or watch others do it again.
About Les Africanistes: We provide market intelligence and business insights for companies operating across African markets, combining local expertise with global investment perspectives. If you are seeking more personalised insights or new partners in Africa.
Book a Consultation: https://lesafricanistes.com/#book-consultation
Subscribe to our Newsletter: https://lesafricanistes.com/#subscribe
Sources & References
Brookings Institution (2022): Africa's climate adaptation finance needs and current shortfalls
World Meteorological Organization - WMO (2023): Climate change impacts on African economies
UN Environment Programme - UNEP (2023): Climate adaptation gap reports and financing data
Climate Action Tracker (2023): African climate vulnerability and adaptation cost projections
African Development Bank - AfDB (2024): Africa's carbon market potential and revenue projections
World Economic Forum - WEF (2024): Global carbon credit market analysis and African participation
Refinitiv (2024): Carbon credit pricing data across global markets
CarbonCredits.com (2024): Market trends, pricing benchmarks, and regional comparisons
CarbonCredits.com (2024): Brazil's jurisdictional REDD+ programs and revenue projections
Mongabay (2024): Pará state's $183 million carbon credit deal and program details
Earth Innovation Institute (2023): Analysis of Brazil's Amazon carbon strategy and implementation
Institute for Essential Services Reform - IESR (2024): Indonesia's carbon absorption potential and market targets
Yale Environment 360 - Yale E360 (2023): IDX Carbon Exchange launch and regulatory framework
Center for International Forestry Research - CIFOR-ICRAF (2023): Mangrove and peatland carbon project analysis
East Asia Forum (2024): Indonesia's carbon market development and economic projections
UN Economic Commission for Africa - UNECA (2023): African carbon infrastructure recommendations
Reuters (September 2025): Africa Climate Summit 2025 commitments and outcomes
World Resources Institute - WRI (2025): Analysis of Africa's climate finance architecture
The Washington Post (2024): Investigation of corporate carbon credit projects and overlapping land rights in Africa and Brazil
Comments